Search found 33 matches

by renols
Sun Feb 10, 2019 11:48 am
Forum: DGDecNV
Topic: [RESOLVED] crop failure in 165?
Replies: 10
Views: 184

Re: crop failure in 165?

Hi. Sorry if it comes off as if I have anything against the Tool. I think it is the best thing I have spent Money on in a very long time. And just because I don't understand something, it doesn't mean that it is a bug. I just didn't understand, why there was a difference between what I saw the in th...
by renols
Sun Feb 10, 2019 11:23 am
Forum: DGDecNV
Topic: [RESOLVED] crop failure in 165?
Replies: 10
Views: 184

Re: crop failure in 165?

Hi. I have no idea what that means. But if it is how it should be all is fine. Just wanted to test the crop Tool because I hadn't used it before. Have done many encodes with 1920x1080 or anything else mode 8 in height, 1920x808 for example, and they seem to play fine. I'll just continue using AvsPmo...
by renols
Sun Feb 10, 2019 11:00 am
Forum: DGDecNV
Topic: [RESOLVED] crop failure in 165?
Replies: 10
Views: 184

Re: crop failure in 165?

Hi. The other thread is labeled as resolved, so I put in in here instead, since it is still crop related. I just tried 166 and then I went to try out the cropping Tool. I have never used it before. I always crop in AvsPmod. However when I use the cropping Tool I am getting the top value OK, but the ...
by renols
Sat Feb 09, 2019 1:31 pm
Forum: DGDecNV
Topic: [RESOLVED] CLIP + cropping
Replies: 55
Views: 1561

Re: [RESOLVED] CLIP + cropping

Hi.

I tried the dll and at least I can now crop in AvsPmod with the same values as before without any over/undercrop.

Not sure how else to test it.

renols
by renols
Sat Feb 09, 2019 7:57 am
Forum: DGDecNV
Topic: [RESOLVED] crop failure in 165?
Replies: 10
Views: 184

Re: crop failure in 165?

Hi.

Didn't think that the two things might be related, until after I wrote this topic.

But thanks for looking into it swiftly. As always :-)

renols
by renols
Sat Feb 09, 2019 5:39 am
Forum: DGDecNV
Topic: [RESOLVED] crop failure in 165?
Replies: 10
Views: 184

Re: crop fehler in 165?

Can't seem to edit my previous post.

Just a not that 164 seems to Work as expected as well. I get "normal" expected crop values in AvsPmod.

Something has happened in 165, which means that one must use "wrong" or different crop values to get the same result with no under or over crop.

renols.
by renols
Sat Feb 09, 2019 5:25 am
Forum: DGDecNV
Topic: [RESOLVED] crop failure in 165?
Replies: 10
Views: 184

[RESOLVED] crop failure in 165?

Hi. I am not sure wether this is an dg issue or an megui issue. However I am seing different behavior in megui after the change from 163 to 165. And what 165 does seems to be wrong. It gives me wrong crop numbers which. Let me try if I can explain this. In 165 it seems like something is very off. In...
by renols
Wed Oct 10, 2018 10:59 am
Forum: DGDecNV
Topic: [RESOLVED] VUI import system
Replies: 5
Views: 461

Re: VUI import system

Hi. Don't use new version of Mediainfo if you want it to show details in master display, and maybe other Places. It has been changed to just show P3 or whatever matches the master display numbers it detects. I am using an old 17.10 version of Mediainfo. Think that it was changed in the version follo...
by renols
Fri Aug 03, 2018 5:41 am
Forum: CUDA Filters
Topic: Quick question about filters
Replies: 5
Views: 484

Re: Quick question about filters

Hi. I have found that unless you are using some filters in the AVS file, one might as well leave out Prefetch(x), as that will just slow down things. If the source one have is pure progressive, and all that needs to be done is cropping and maybe resizing, then leaving out prefetch(x), will be faster...
by renols
Wed Aug 01, 2018 11:05 am
Forum: DGDecNV
Topic: Feature Requests
Replies: 307
Views: 77573

Re: Feature Requests

Investigating the subs number issue... Dialog norm is not removed. I'll look into doing that optionally. Right now, I don't even know what it is. :lol: Hehe. I have no clue either. Just notice when using eac3to that it removes it per default, and it says that it is not recommended not to remove it....