aceado, that processor and motherboard you have? the cpu and the motherboard wouldn't matter for encoding as for encoding videos even if its 6, 8 or even 10 cores there's still gonna be the same result of the bottleneck being the cpu not being able to keep up with the decoding speed of the gpu i'm ...

as you can see from both the video that i posted and the picture you have shown there is some sort of bottleneck the decoding the video isn't your issue here nor is it the bottleneck the main issue is normally down to how fast the cpu is able encode it at which for alot of users this would be the ca...

thank you admin ! both a avisynth script and using avsmeter and this this method should yeilf the same result depeg how the use wants to go about it... for me this way is more to the point (quicker lol) the latter would be the true decoding speed before any filters are added here's a quick small vid...

the first thing you need to understand is the first picture is showing that its using the NVENC which is the builtin hardware encoder so yes it will be faster.... best way to find out if it is using gpu to the fullist is to load up a video directly into dgnv itself goto video > disable display then ...

it is a 1070
if there's any testing you want me to do just ask

i can confirm that the 1000 series does work fine but i'm unsure as to how the cuda side of it might effect or would it just be ok ? (any suggestions for testing would be nice)

back again once more with another question you said unless the drivers support cuvid any new card that comes out it should work. after thinking back to the issue i notice years ago.... i came across this in the changelog which is the reason i had to wait back then (late 2012) for the support to be a...

thank you answering my question

one slightly of the topic question which i hope you don't mind
do you need to wait for nvidia to add support to use cuvid on newer cards when they come out i.e 1080/1070 or would they just work without any issues made just a newer build for is needed ?

couldn't you also use dvxa2 for the decoding if there isn't an option for cuvid ?
isn't the purevideo the same thing as cuvid ? (meaning what its able to decode as such)
i might be wrong but i'm guessing that means we need to wait for nvidia to add support for it in cuvid?

don't forget for nvidia there is a total of 5 cards which does 10bit decoding. which is: gtx 750 se, gtx 950, gtx 960 and now there's gtx 1070, gtx 1080 which is also able to support 12bit decoding :o all details was found from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia_PureVideo#Table_of_GPUs_containing_...

any progress with adding single rate deinterlacing ?

single rate would be nice to have for sure
i do wonder how well it does its deinterlacing vs dgnv

if there's one request i would ask for which i don't think you would mind is adding the option to deinterlace (basic like deinterlace=1) and maybe bobbing if skylake supports it

HELL YES!! i got it working it seems i can overlook one minor thing :? updated the drivers to the latest version 20.19.15.4312 (15.40.11.64.4312) and its working just fine just a dead simple test to compare between 32 vs 64bit. al i used was LoadPlugin("DGDecodeIM.dll") dgsourceim("test.dgim",engine...

admin wrote:Oy. Do you know if I can just drop in a skylake for my i7-4770K or do I have to get a new machine?

no sorry you would need a brand new motherboard for it due to it being a newer socket and chipset

admin wrote:Give this a try with your non-HEVC streams. HEVC will have to wait until I get a skylake.

http://rationalqm.us/dgdecim/dgdecim_skylake_test.zip

Works fine on my Haswell.

still hangs it seems on both 32 or 64bit

p.s using windows 7 64bit if it matters or not

True. The real question is when CUVID or IMSDK will support HEVC Main10 with full hardware acceleration. CUVID needs to support 10-bit to stay ahead. They both have to do it to support UHD bluray and we have to just patiently wait. if your still up to trying again it seems intel has updated their s...

admin wrote:Sorry, no progress. I don't have a Skylake yet and there is not yet a formal release of IMSDK supporting it. What can I do?

nothing apart from waiting for the lazy arse intel to get something sorted

any progress with this fixing this

admin wrote:What is your Intel graphics driver version?

that would be 15.40.7.4279 (10.18.15.4279)

admin wrote:Rebuilt DLLs work fine here on my i7 4770K. I'll do some research about this.

sure the source code to QSVEncC might shine some light on how it talks to it but i wouldn't have a clue myself lol

Try this: http://rationalqm.us/misc/aceado.zip I don't think DGIndexIM is affected but if so let me know. so you know its works just fine in software decoding which you would expect same with indexing aswell also i've just tested it out and it still hangs it seems. both 32bit and 64bit was tested :...

Intel has not made a formal release of INDE supporting Skylake: https://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-media-sdk/topic/593838 However, they say you can have a try with media sdk version 6.0.0.388 but no guarantees. I currently use 6.0.0.349. I will try in the next days to rebuild with 6.0.0....

so today i was wanting to get a faster decoding fps than that which i can get from DGDecNV (vp5 ~130fps) so i remember that my old sandy bridge i7 2600k (3000hd) was able do double the speed which is great! however there's some bad news it seems. i've upgraded to the latest skylake i7 6700k (hd 530)...