Just curious: where might one encounter a 2560x720 stream? Isn't that a 3.55:1 aspect ratio (I never heard of such a thing)? Some custom commercial project e.g. museum or retail or ...?MrVideo wrote:Am I correct in assuming that a 2560x720p25 h.264 elementary stream file cannot be decoded by dgindexnv?
Search found 108 matches
- Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:53 pm
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: [RESOLVED] Oddball resolution - 2560x720p
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10832
Re: Oddball resolution - 2560x720p
- Fri Apr 20, 2012 2:24 pm
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: [RESOLVED] Glitch in decoding
- Replies: 34
- Views: 46441
Re: Glitch in decoding
Ah, ok good deal--thanks for telling.neuron2 wrote:I'm running various versions on different PCs. I run the latest 301.24 beta on one of them. It seems to be just fine.
- Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:12 pm
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: [RESOLVED] Glitch in decoding
- Replies: 34
- Views: 46441
Re: Glitch in decoding
I discovered my card wasn't properly seated and it has been very reliable since I fixed that. How embarrassing. :D But thanks for telling--this has happened to the best of us. I'd pulled my own GT520 so as not to get bitten by any of the glitches reported in here. Maybe I'll get it out of the box a...
- Sun Jan 08, 2012 9:02 am
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: [RESOLVED] Glitch in decoding
- Replies: 34
- Views: 46441
Re: Glitch in decoding
I don't know where he is now. It seems he's retired to New Mexico (I wonder if he and Imus are neighbors). I retired to Texas long ago (and am WAY older than you!). I wonder if I still have his "uncle lar' and lil' tommy animal stories" record somewhere. I did also enjoy his "Cheap Trashy Show Biz ...
- Sat Jan 07, 2012 11:10 am
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: [RESOLVED] Glitch in decoding
- Replies: 34
- Views: 46441
Re: Glitch in decoding
You didn't tell me what "HO" means. Speaking of Don Imus, I wonder what ever happened to Larry Lujack? I mighta guessed if anyone would get into trouble with words it woulda been him. You're prolly too young to know about him... It never occurred to me that HO might be taken out-of-context! Thank y...
- Thu Jan 05, 2012 5:07 pm
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: [RESOLVED] Glitch in decoding
- Replies: 34
- Views: 46441
Re: Glitch in decoding
I can say this 520 card is one of the crappiest things I have ever put in a computer. Hmmm why don't you tell us what you REALLY think! :lol: Thanks--I hope you just have a bad board but I wouldn't know if my MSI N520GT sucks also or not--I unplugged it awhile back in favor of my trusty 9600GT... :D
- Thu Jan 05, 2012 7:18 am
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: [RESOLVED] Glitch in decoding
- Replies: 34
- Views: 46441
Re: Glitch in decoding
I've had nothing but trouble with my 520. It didn't error on this stream but it is an under-powered piece of junk IMHO. As soon as the high-end cards with VP5 arrive, I'm junking it. Since your HO is so well-respected here and elsewhere, I wonder if you can elaborate on your findings re: your 520? ...
- Wed Nov 23, 2011 9:36 am
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: Getting weird artifacting at the same place when encoding
- Replies: 36
- Views: 49550
Re: Getting weird artifacting at the same place when encodin
FWIW I experienced what was probably a one-frame glitch on one of my BD conversions on viewing recently. An hour & a half movie. I've not made any effort to t-shoot the glitch, except to say here that: 1. Keeping in mind it was (likely) a one-frame glitch out of 24/sec, it looked to me to be blockin...
- Sun Nov 06, 2011 7:23 am
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: GT 520 VP5 performance
- Replies: 55
- Views: 80964
Re: GT 520 VP5 performance
Many thanks clumpco, I didn't know any of that! I'll be back here in a few weeks with results from my new build! I hope!
The link is excellent, I have bookmarked and will be re-reading it again...
The link is excellent, I have bookmarked and will be re-reading it again...
- Sat Nov 05, 2011 7:35 am
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: GT 520 VP5 performance
- Replies: 55
- Views: 80964
Re: GT 520 VP5 performance
Here are the 1st/2nd pass results for encoding a 1 hour show to 720p @ 3000 kb/s with exactly the same settings for both: Q6600 - slightly overclocked to 103 MHz FSB http://www.clumpton.com/uknwebimg/clipboard_2011-11-04_18-35-12.png Total encode/mux time: 78m17s i7 2600 K unlocked to 43x http://ww...
- Fri Nov 04, 2011 7:40 am
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: GT 520 VP5 performance
- Replies: 55
- Views: 80964
Re: GT 520 VP5 performance
I wonder can you clumpco or anyone here confirm e.g. that an i5-2500K or i7-2600 or 2700K will encode >2x the Q6600?
- Tue Oct 25, 2011 11:54 am
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: transcoding glitch
- Replies: 51
- Views: 63390
Re: transcoding glitch
I'd not blame DG if he balked at buying a relatively expensive TV "set" as you've reported here. Maybe you have another example you can provide?
- Tue Oct 11, 2011 8:57 am
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: GT 520 VP5 performance
- Replies: 55
- Views: 80964
Re: GT 520 VP5 performance
I just realized I bought the Q6600 for its "overclock-ability" yet I have never attempted that--maybe I will do so next.clumpco wrote:... the Q6600 is the limiting factor I'm afraid.
- Mon Oct 10, 2011 7:51 am
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: GT 520 VP5 performance
- Replies: 55
- Views: 80964
Re: GT 520 VP5 performance
Well, so much for benchmarking & framerates. Reencoding with x264 there is virtually no improvement with the 520, at least with the VC-1 program I'd done right before swapping-out my 9600 for the 520: With the 9600GT: Wed 10/05/2011 06:01 PM D:\video>"C:\Program Files (x86)\x264\pipebuf.exe" "C:\Pro...
- Sat Oct 08, 2011 1:28 pm
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: [RESOLVED] DGDecNV (2028,2041) + MeGUI error message
- Replies: 6
- Views: 10080
Re: DGDecNV (2028,2041) + MeGUI error message
Have you done what the dialog said?invictus wrote:Any ideas to fix it ?
- Fri Oct 07, 2011 6:48 am
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: GT 520 VP5 performance
- Replies: 55
- Views: 80964
Re: GT 520 VP5 performance
Indexing does not use the GPU! All it does is scan through the source stream and write an index file. There is no *decoding* done at all when indexing. I didn't know that! :oops: The gain in CPU can be substantial in some scenarios, such as when resizing and deinterlacing on the GPU, or when you ha...
- Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:36 am
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: GT 520 VP5 performance
- Replies: 55
- Views: 80964
Re: GT 520 VP5 performance
Hey guys, given the decoding fps of this 520GT is 3x that of my previous 9600GT, I am so underwhelmed by the real-world Indexing results that I wonder if I might be doing something wrong. I'd just indexed a VC-1 program with my 9600, so after installing the 520GT I did it several times again, using ...
- Thu Oct 06, 2011 5:18 am
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: GT 520 VP5 performance
- Replies: 55
- Views: 80964
Re: GT 520 VP5 performance
Almost correct. CUVID = decoding is performed on the dedicated video processor (VP). Note that the VP is not the graphics engine. CUDA = decoding is performed on a combination of the CPU and the CUDA processors. I don't know the breakdown of tasks between the two. You can leave everything set for C...
- Wed Oct 05, 2011 5:17 pm
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: GT 520 VP5 performance
- Replies: 55
- Views: 80964
Re: GT 520 VP5 performance
Due to a bug in the VP3+ engines for MPEG2, I have to use CUDA instead of the VP engine for MPEG2. I need to check with Nvidia about the status of that for VP5. If it was fixed, I can revert to the video engine if a VP5 is detected. Got my 520 today, though I've not installed it yet, and am trying ...
- Thu Sep 29, 2011 7:22 am
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: [RESOLVED] Invalid License File!
- Replies: 5
- Views: 9423
Re: [RESOLVED] Invalid License File!
Maybe you dislike bumping old threads, but this is what I got when searching "invalid license" and I thought "may as well keep issues together". My mobo's ethernet port failed so I put-in a new NIC and had to re-gen my license file. Using Firefox 4.01, it appeared to work but yielded a simple "N" as...
- Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:20 am
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: [RESOLVED] Set consistent audio filename
- Replies: 25
- Views: 31654
Re: [RESOLVED] Set consistent audio filename
I've slipstreamed into 2041 the DGIndexNV manual with the note about delays added. Ah yes, and I see that it is a thing of beauty: Demuxed audio files will be named after the project name and additional parameters of the audio format. For example: "arte.hd PID 083 L2 2ch 48 128 DELAY -27ms.mp2". Th...
- Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:35 pm
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: [RESOLVED] Set consistent audio filename
- Replies: 25
- Views: 31654
Re: [RESOLVED] Set consistent audio filename
Must...resist...this feeling....of power...neuron2 wrote:laserfan, your wish is my command. I will add it as you suggest.
Thank you from this delighted customer!
- Fri Sep 23, 2011 11:19 am
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: [RESOLVED] Set consistent audio filename
- Replies: 25
- Views: 31654
Re: Set consistent audio filename
The delay arises because demuxing elementary streams may not hit the same PTS values for the audio and video at that point in the stream. There is no guarantee in a stream that access units for audio and video with the same presentation times will be close together. So, for example, if we demux and...
- Sat Sep 17, 2011 9:15 am
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: [RESOLVED] Half Image Corruption
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11666
Re: Half Image Corruption
Thanks for your reply!neuron2 wrote:Actually it's a Galaxy GT520 w/2GB DDR3.
- Fri Sep 16, 2011 12:05 pm
- Forum: DGDecNV
- Topic: [RESOLVED] Half Image Corruption
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11666
Re: Half Image Corruption
If you don't mind telling, which card did you buy?neuron2 wrote:BTW I have just installed a secondary GT 520 and find that it decodes 1080P at around 170 fps, consistent with other's findings.
Congrats on the fix, and here's to a good night's sleep tonight!