DGDemux development

User avatar
Rocky
Posts: 3557
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:57 pm

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Rocky »

Guys, can we please start making separate threads for bugs/issues? I'd like to keep this thread for general matters such as feature requests and theoretical discussion.
DAE avatar
Guest 2
Posts: 903
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 2:18 pm

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Guest 2 »

Remotely trying the new version.

Tried to demux a BD (In full bloom) whose main title is composed by 3 m2ts, just audio tracks and subs, no video.

Is it normal that there is no more progress, i.e. the green bar is sliding instead of showing the progress and no percentage?

Not enough bandwidth now to check the sups. Will have a look tomorrow when at home.
User avatar
Rocky
Posts: 3557
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:57 pm

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Rocky »

Whether it is "normal" is up to you. It is by design. Full progress could come back one day.
DAE avatar
Guest 2
Posts: 903
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 2:18 pm

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Guest 2 »

Saw drag and drop support.

Great! :salute:
User avatar
Rocky
Posts: 3557
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:57 pm

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Rocky »

My pleasure. Thank you for the feature request.
DAE avatar
Guest

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Guest »

Keeps getting better and better
User avatar
Rocky
Posts: 3557
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:57 pm

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Rocky »

gonca wrote:
Tue Aug 04, 2020 3:58 pm
Keeps getting better and better
In large part thanks to our wonderful users' feedback and feature requests. :salute:
DAE avatar
Guest

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Guest »

@Rocky
You stated that
I will write a simple SSIF.SMAP -> SSIF utility to convert for MakeMKV.
If you did write this utility, would it be possible to release it as standalone like DGMVCCombine?
User avatar
Rocky
Posts: 3557
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:57 pm

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Rocky »

I'll ask Britney to do it. Everyone's gotta earn their spurs!
User avatar
Britney
Posts: 145
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2020 3:24 pm

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Britney »

I'd love to help y'all. But what is an SSIF? The haters tell me to take up coding. Is that like the same thing?
User avatar
Rocky
Posts: 3557
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:57 pm

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Rocky »

Tell you what, Brit, don't worry about it, I'll ask Sherman.
User avatar
Britney
Posts: 145
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2020 3:24 pm

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Britney »

Oops, did I do it again?
DAE avatar
Guest

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Guest »

At least she can dance
User avatar
Britney
Posts: 145
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2020 3:24 pm

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Britney »

And sing!

Be nice and maybe one day you too can be Curly Approved. Or maybe you are looking for Britney Approved. Kisses.
User avatar
Rocky
Posts: 3557
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:57 pm

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Rocky »

gonca wrote:
Mon Aug 10, 2020 7:40 pm
@Rocky
You stated that
I will write a simple SSIF.SMAP -> SSIF utility to convert for MakeMKV.
If you did write this utility, would it be possible to release it as standalone like DGMVCCombine?
gonca, just so we don't do this on a whim, can you explain your use case, i.e., how this will actually be useful for you?
DAE avatar
Guest

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Guest »

I use MakeMKV as my primary decryption software.
As stated before, I don't do 3D on normal basis, but on some occasions I had to get 3D blurays (avaiability, Canada doesn't have US market share selection ) and use left eye view for 2D view
Haven't had to yet, but if I have to back up a 3D view, from these disc backups, I might have to restore the SSIF files from the SMAP files.
I could always dig up the discs and re-rip, but as I mentioned in the 3D request thread my cataloguing system is decent but my storage system for discs sucks. That is why I got Sanctum 3D for testing.
Of course there is always those users whose sole tool for decryption is MakeMKV so they can't re-rip and get SSIF files.
Thanks for considering the request
User avatar
Rocky
Posts: 3557
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:57 pm

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Rocky »

gonca wrote:
Sat Aug 15, 2020 12:36 pm
I might have to restore the SSIF files from the SMAP files
Well that is the key; you don't really know if you might need them. You don't need SSIF files for playback from your ripped hard-drive files. That's why MakeMKV does not bother making them. And there is no software I know of to allow that hard drive folder with full SSIF files to be properly written back to an optical bluray disk. It would need to support UDF hard links, etc.

So, you haven't made a convincing argument for this feature request.
DAE avatar
Guest

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Guest »

Ok
User avatar
Rocky
Posts: 3557
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:57 pm

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Rocky »

There is one legit case I read about. Some Linux app required the SSIF files for some obscure reason. Linux is not currently on my radar, and safe to say remains close to zero priority for me, so do the math. ;)
DAE avatar
Guest

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Guest »

It's a Linux batch/script file to recreate the SSIF files from the SMAP extension.
The TV in question can't playback the SMAP files
User avatar
Emulgator
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue May 12, 2020 9:39 am

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Emulgator »

Hi DG, just a quick hint:
For 2D .mpls DGDemux 1.0.0.38 and 1.0.0.39 offer unusually high number of angles = number of chapters.
For 3D .mpls it looks ok, number of angles looks reasonable.
Made no demuxing test this time, I just read the angle dropdowns.
P.S. Well just started demuxing of a 26 chapter disc where I could and did specify angle 26.
Then I aborted demuxing after 3,6GB to see what would be the output:
DGDemux 1.0.0.39 starts properly at the beginning of the .mpls with the only available angle 1,
so maybe just a GUI thingy.
User avatar
Rocky
Posts: 3557
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:57 pm

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Rocky »

Yeah, just a GUI thing. I'll fix it up. Thanks for pointing it out.

Then I'm going to put a temporary moratorium on new features, because Sherman is upset. He snapped off at slipstream 29 to do the 3x faster development and now there is a boat load of merging to do.
User avatar
Rocky
Posts: 3557
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:57 pm

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Rocky »

Please re-download build 39 for the fix.
User avatar
Emulgator
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue May 12, 2020 9:39 am

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Emulgator »

Looks good now, Angles are greyed out if only 1 Angle is present.

A quick find from redownloaded 1.0.0.39 (may have sitting there longer):

BD QUACK_D1 (Wall-E): Video stream 1b00 is reported as Dolby Vision, should be Secondary Video (PIP).

In this movie stream 1b00 contains the storyboard version (720x480x23.976p)
rendered on top of the main movie (1920x1080x23.976p).

For the main movie the secondary video consists of storyboard stills all over the place, together with audio commentary.
For the short movie Burn-E the secondary video consists of animated storyboard in the upper left corner.

(If my (partly guesswork) table is correct, 1b00..1b1f should be the PID range for Secondary video streams.)
User avatar
Rocky
Posts: 3557
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:57 pm

Re: DGDemux development

Post by Rocky »

I slipped the fix into build 39 so re-download. Thank you for pointing this out.
Post Reply