DGDemux development
Re: DGDemux development
Guys, can we please start making separate threads for bugs/issues? I'd like to keep this thread for general matters such as feature requests and theoretical discussion.
Re: DGDemux development
Remotely trying the new version.
Tried to demux a BD (In full bloom) whose main title is composed by 3 m2ts, just audio tracks and subs, no video.
Is it normal that there is no more progress, i.e. the green bar is sliding instead of showing the progress and no percentage?
Not enough bandwidth now to check the sups. Will have a look tomorrow when at home.
Tried to demux a BD (In full bloom) whose main title is composed by 3 m2ts, just audio tracks and subs, no video.
Is it normal that there is no more progress, i.e. the green bar is sliding instead of showing the progress and no percentage?
Not enough bandwidth now to check the sups. Will have a look tomorrow when at home.
Re: DGDemux development
Whether it is "normal" is up to you. It is by design. Full progress could come back one day.
Re: DGDemux development
Saw drag and drop support.
Great!
Great!
Re: DGDemux development
My pleasure. Thank you for the feature request.
Re: DGDemux development
Keeps getting better and better
Re: DGDemux development
@Rocky
You stated that
You stated that
If you did write this utility, would it be possible to release it as standalone like DGMVCCombine?I will write a simple SSIF.SMAP -> SSIF utility to convert for MakeMKV.
Re: DGDemux development
I'll ask Britney to do it. Everyone's gotta earn their spurs!
Re: DGDemux development
I'd love to help y'all. But what is an SSIF? The haters tell me to take up coding. Is that like the same thing?
Re: DGDemux development
Tell you what, Brit, don't worry about it, I'll ask Sherman.
Re: DGDemux development
Oops, did I do it again?
Re: DGDemux development
At least she can dance
Re: DGDemux development
And sing!
Be nice and maybe one day you too can be Curly Approved. Or maybe you are looking for Britney Approved. Kisses.
Be nice and maybe one day you too can be Curly Approved. Or maybe you are looking for Britney Approved. Kisses.
Re: DGDemux development
gonca, just so we don't do this on a whim, can you explain your use case, i.e., how this will actually be useful for you?
Re: DGDemux development
I use MakeMKV as my primary decryption software.
As stated before, I don't do 3D on normal basis, but on some occasions I had to get 3D blurays (avaiability, Canada doesn't have US market share selection ) and use left eye view for 2D view
Haven't had to yet, but if I have to back up a 3D view, from these disc backups, I might have to restore the SSIF files from the SMAP files.
I could always dig up the discs and re-rip, but as I mentioned in the 3D request thread my cataloguing system is decent but my storage system for discs sucks. That is why I got Sanctum 3D for testing.
Of course there is always those users whose sole tool for decryption is MakeMKV so they can't re-rip and get SSIF files.
Thanks for considering the request
As stated before, I don't do 3D on normal basis, but on some occasions I had to get 3D blurays (avaiability, Canada doesn't have US market share selection ) and use left eye view for 2D view
Haven't had to yet, but if I have to back up a 3D view, from these disc backups, I might have to restore the SSIF files from the SMAP files.
I could always dig up the discs and re-rip, but as I mentioned in the 3D request thread my cataloguing system is decent but my storage system for discs sucks. That is why I got Sanctum 3D for testing.
Of course there is always those users whose sole tool for decryption is MakeMKV so they can't re-rip and get SSIF files.
Thanks for considering the request
Re: DGDemux development
Well that is the key; you don't really know if you might need them. You don't need SSIF files for playback from your ripped hard-drive files. That's why MakeMKV does not bother making them. And there is no software I know of to allow that hard drive folder with full SSIF files to be properly written back to an optical bluray disk. It would need to support UDF hard links, etc.
So, you haven't made a convincing argument for this feature request.
Re: DGDemux development
There is one legit case I read about. Some Linux app required the SSIF files for some obscure reason. Linux is not currently on my radar, and safe to say remains close to zero priority for me, so do the math.
Re: DGDemux development
It's a Linux batch/script file to recreate the SSIF files from the SMAP extension.
The TV in question can't playback the SMAP files
The TV in question can't playback the SMAP files
Re: DGDemux development
Hi DG, just a quick hint:
For 2D .mpls DGDemux 1.0.0.38 and 1.0.0.39 offer unusually high number of angles = number of chapters.
For 3D .mpls it looks ok, number of angles looks reasonable.
Made no demuxing test this time, I just read the angle dropdowns.
P.S. Well just started demuxing of a 26 chapter disc where I could and did specify angle 26.
Then I aborted demuxing after 3,6GB to see what would be the output:
DGDemux 1.0.0.39 starts properly at the beginning of the .mpls with the only available angle 1,
so maybe just a GUI thingy.
For 2D .mpls DGDemux 1.0.0.38 and 1.0.0.39 offer unusually high number of angles = number of chapters.
For 3D .mpls it looks ok, number of angles looks reasonable.
Made no demuxing test this time, I just read the angle dropdowns.
P.S. Well just started demuxing of a 26 chapter disc where I could and did specify angle 26.
Then I aborted demuxing after 3,6GB to see what would be the output:
DGDemux 1.0.0.39 starts properly at the beginning of the .mpls with the only available angle 1,
so maybe just a GUI thingy.
Re: DGDemux development
Yeah, just a GUI thing. I'll fix it up. Thanks for pointing it out.
Then I'm going to put a temporary moratorium on new features, because Sherman is upset. He snapped off at slipstream 29 to do the 3x faster development and now there is a boat load of merging to do.
Then I'm going to put a temporary moratorium on new features, because Sherman is upset. He snapped off at slipstream 29 to do the 3x faster development and now there is a boat load of merging to do.
Re: DGDemux development
Please re-download build 39 for the fix.
Re: DGDemux development
Looks good now, Angles are greyed out if only 1 Angle is present.
A quick find from redownloaded 1.0.0.39 (may have sitting there longer):
BD QUACK_D1 (Wall-E): Video stream 1b00 is reported as Dolby Vision, should be Secondary Video (PIP).
In this movie stream 1b00 contains the storyboard version (720x480x23.976p)
rendered on top of the main movie (1920x1080x23.976p).
For the main movie the secondary video consists of storyboard stills all over the place, together with audio commentary.
For the short movie Burn-E the secondary video consists of animated storyboard in the upper left corner.
(If my (partly guesswork) table is correct, 1b00..1b1f should be the PID range for Secondary video streams.)
A quick find from redownloaded 1.0.0.39 (may have sitting there longer):
BD QUACK_D1 (Wall-E): Video stream 1b00 is reported as Dolby Vision, should be Secondary Video (PIP).
In this movie stream 1b00 contains the storyboard version (720x480x23.976p)
rendered on top of the main movie (1920x1080x23.976p).
For the main movie the secondary video consists of storyboard stills all over the place, together with audio commentary.
For the short movie Burn-E the secondary video consists of animated storyboard in the upper left corner.
(If my (partly guesswork) table is correct, 1b00..1b1f should be the PID range for Secondary video streams.)
Re: DGDemux development
I slipped the fix into build 39 so re-download. Thank you for pointing this out.