Page 34 of 37
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 9:26 am
by Guest
Gonna copy some movies from my archive and will try to test today
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 9:38 am
by Sherman
Sweet. Thank you, gonca. Would be great if you can test a 3D disk, demuxing all streams and just the MVC stream.
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:09 am
by Guest
Copying one of those as well
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 11:44 am
by Guest
Gonna report one disc at a time so my head doesn't explode from the data
VENOM 4K
Primary video in slow is one byte bigger than fast
All other tracks, including DV and PGS, are identical
BUMBLEBEE 4K
Had to use no preallocation
Too many streams and preallocation was using up all free space and then some
One byte issue (I realize it might no be an issue but still reporting)
DV matches
Embedded AC3 matches
all other files match
VENOM 1080p
Size mismatch on AVC file
ac3 files match
PGS files match
can't open dts files
BUMBLEBEE 1080p
AVC made file compare go nuts
all other files match
AGE OF EXTINCTION 3D
AVC file made it go nuts again
*.tag files could not be opened
everything else matches
MVC only
match
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 11:57 am
by Rocky
That's fine. Maybe edit the post instead of making a new post for every disk?
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2020 9:28 pm
by Rocky
for your edit
Can you provide purchase links for the last 3 disks? Thank you.
Also please report only issues. You don't have to mention what works.
Finally, 'go nuts' is vague.
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 5:04 am
by Guest
Can you provide purchase links for the last 3 disks?
You mean the 1080p ones?
Venom and Bumblebee were part the 4K set but the blu-ray should be the same
https://www.amazon.ca/Venom-Blu-ray-Bil ... dvd&sr=1-3
https://www.amazon.ca/Bumblebee-Blu-ray ... dvd&sr=1-3
https://www.amazon.ca/Transformers-Age- ... dvd&sr=1-2
Size mismatch is the one byte issue
'go nuts'
Large output from fc due to the filler NALUs
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 11:52 am
by Rocky
All right, Sherman has fixed the DTS.
Ah, I see, the tags files are not generated at all!
OK, I think we're good to go. No further clarification needed.
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 12:19 pm
by Rocky
OK, please re-download the test build. The DTS and tags issues should be fixed. Please advise any further issues you find.
Greatly appreciate your testing, gonca!
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 6:07 pm
by Guest
The DTS and tags issue is fixed but something else popped up
Please note the different delays on the same files
I'll retest if you wish
It was the Venom 1080p disc
By the way
If you like the transformer movies you would probably like Bumblebee
Edit 1
Mediainfo and MKVToolNIX report delay of 0ms which agrees with the slow demux
Edit 2
If you want me to test more discs let me know
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 7:45 pm
by Rocky
I'll probably have to buy it because I can't duplicate that. I'll compare the code closely to see how a discrepancy like that could happen.
However, I was thinking of getting rid of the DELAY anyway as it should always be 0. Have you ever seen a non-zero value when demuxing slow or with EAC3TO? DGDecNV has to do it because you can set your range such that the project doesn't begin at the start of the first M2TS.
Great to hear DTS and tags are working!
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 7:48 pm
by Guest
I don't remember seeing any non zero delays in BDs
If it helps these are DTS HD-MA tracks
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 7:51 pm
by Rocky
OK, thank you. I'll check all my disks and if there are no non-zero delays in slow mode then bye-bye DELAY! Sherman is back in 1935 but I think I can handle it.
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 8:17 pm
by Guest
One more thing
This time I kept all the audio for comparison
In the slow demux the ac3 are all -8ms delay and the dts is 0 ms
In the fast demux they are listed as -8 ms
Is it possible the fast demux is somehow using the delay for the ac3 files and applying it to the dts files?
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2020 4:12 pm
by Guest
I realize that you are considering removing delay reporting but I decided to run some quick tests to try and narrow this down.
My regular demux >> Video + Primary eng audio (DTS HD-MA in this case) + eng subtitles
Delays match between slow and fast
Primary eng audio
Delays match
Demux both DTS HD-MA tracks
Delays match
Demux both DTS HD-MA tracks + any ac3 track
Delays don't match
It is as if the ac3 delay is being copied over
It might just be one of those once in a blue moon things
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2020 4:21 pm
by Rocky
OK, thank you. I'll check it out.
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2020 4:47 pm
by Guest
Tried 3 more movies with similar dts and ac3 track mixtures
If only dts is demuxed then the delays match
If only ac3 is demuxed then the delays match
If dts and ac3 are both demuxed slow seems to have the correct delays, but in fast demux the dts tracks are assigned the delay values of the ac3 tracks
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2020 7:34 pm
by Rocky
Yes, thank you. I'll release a fix tomorrow. Your theory is correct.
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2020 9:21 pm
by Sherman
Just popping in to say it's looking possible to get Albert to join the forum. He wants some assurances about not allowing stupid people in here. I said, other than
Natasha, should be no problem. And he wants immediate Moose or Britney Approval.
Great job
Rocky on the fast mode. Going back down. Wish me luck...
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2020 9:39 pm
by Bullwinkle
Stop it, Sherman! You'll make me project from my second stomach. Honorary stomping award coming your way. Bring Albert back with you and you could be Moose Lodge material. Of course he can have whatever approval he wants.
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2020 8:32 am
by Rocky
@gonca
Please re-download the test version. The wrong delay values for DTS should be fixed.
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2020 10:29 am
by Sherman
We're back! Albert is going to make a decision and let me know.
Yeah
Bullwinkle, that FixTHDGaps() function is ridiculously slow. Too many small reads and writes. Have to do my own read and write buffering. OS buffering is just not enough because system calls are slow all by themselves. Thanks for pointing it out.
EDIT: I have now fully read/write buffered it and it now fixes a 5GB file in 4 seconds, versus almost a minute with the old version. It's speedy now, like DGSplit.
I'll test it and then commit it for integration into the release.
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2020 10:31 am
by Rocky
Way to go
Sherm!
It's speedy now, like DGSplit.
Thanks! My ticket out of the
Box of
Shame.
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2020 11:27 am
by Sherman
I updated the fast mode test build with the FixTHDGaps() speedup (applies to both slow and fast modes), so please re-download and test. If no adverse feedback is received, maybe Rocky will update build 44.
Re: DGDemux development
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2020 4:10 pm
by Guest
Delays are all good now.
Good job
I'll try to find some movies with seamless branching to test Gaps Processing