I can't because the forum doesn't let new useres to post private messages.neuron2 wrote:The DI software version is documented as alpha quality. It will likely not be developed any further. If you need a refund PM me your details.
Thanks.
I can't because the forum doesn't let new useres to post private messages.neuron2 wrote:The DI software version is documented as alpha quality. It will likely not be developed any further. If you need a refund PM me your details.
The option:neuron2 wrote:I don't see any board settings to control that.
OK, send me an email. I need your registered email in any case to find you.
Apperas only after 3 posts...now i can send pm anyway.PM:Send private message
This is very unfortunate.neuron2 wrote:The DI software version is documented as alpha quality. It will likely not be developed any further. If you need a refund PM me your details.
I thank you for that, but there is also the issue where I have to wait several minutes before the file I try to open actually gets loaded into the program.neuron2 wrote:If your only issue is the -at option I can easily fix that, as long as you tell me how to reproduce it.
Yeah, well, it's a shame that this thing has to be gfx card specific.neuron2 wrote:It's a shame you don't have an nVidia card.
I'd say that the program just works because it actually uses CUDA (nVidia specific feature) which makes your suggestion pointlessDal wrote:neuron2 wrote:IMO you should drop the HW accelleration thing and reprogram this fine program so it just works, regardless of hardware.
It uses CUVID to be more exact, but your point is correct. Your latter speculation will depend on whether they release a CUVID API for other platforms.kypec wrote:I'd say that the program just works because it actually uses CUDA (nVidia specific feature) which makes your suggestion pointless
BTW I've read somewhere that nVidia plans to open/release CUDA for other platforms as well so maybe there's a hope also for non-nVidia GPU to benefit from it in the future
Well, I'm using 0.3.4.0, which you could say is ancient, but it never failed on me. Although, I'm using it only as simple preset and queue manager and use none of its auto tools. I don't know exactly what caused my friend problems, it's bit hard to understand him what actually doesn't work (he's Romanian...), but I gave him my Megui folder and it worked for him flawlessly. It may have been error on his end, some settings misconfiguration or something, or it could've been fixed in later version, because I think he's using some recent build now without problems.Zathor wrote:??? Please create a bug report or send me the details about the problems (here as a PM or in the doom9 forum). In my opinion there are sometimes of course new problems with newer builds but in general newer versions are less buggy than old ones.Nick007 wrote:From experience of my friend, recent versions of Megui are bogus.
But please keep in mind that MeGUI never supported DGAVCDecDI and (as written above) never will support it.
Btw I am going to remove the old DGAVCDec (should have done that already a long time ago).
HW acceleration/decoding does have a place, it's great for HD encoding but very poor when the encoder encoding rate is higher than about 105fps such as when encoding to XVid formats because the nVidia GPU cannot decode fast enough for the XVid encoder. It slows down the encoding process significantly even on previous generation CPU's.Dal wrote: Yeah, well, it's a shame that this thing has to be gfx card specific.
IMO you should drop the HW accelleration thing and reprogram this fine program so it just works, regardless of hardware.
Thanks anyway.
When I saw your post you raised my hopes until I looked at the available cards in the 500 series. The 520 is the closest things but it's a bottom end card with inadequate shaders and is inferior to my GT240 DDR5 card in all respects except for VP5. The GT545's have been made by the card manufacturers to fill the gap in the nVidia range between bottom end and mid range where the GT240 sits. Unfortunately the GT545 isn't a true 500 series card, it's a 400 series with VP4 video engine.neuron2 wrote:With VP5 you can keep up with the encoder even with SD.