I have just sent you a small fragment from The pillars of the Earth.
Sometimes it happens to me that a file is recognized as 25 fps from MediaInfo and DGIndexNV (which gives me a TFF warning in info side bar) and as 50i from eac3to.
Which is which? Are those the two faces of the same medal? IMHO if really interlaced, it should be 50fps in info panel.
Or not?
What is the real format of the chunk I sent you?
[RESOLVED] Interlaced or not?
Re: Interlaced or not?
It's progressive content. The shift with separatefields() is normal. Think about it and you'll understand why the bottom field appears shifted. If you don't like that effect then step through bobbed fields this way:
DGSource()
DGBob()
DGSource()
DGBob()
Re: Interlaced or not?
Thanks I will do
My question was about the parsing and TTF showed in the info lateral bar even for progressive material.
It simply reports what the stream tells. True?
P.S: Just picture that eac3to reports it as 50i
Re: [RESOLVED] Interlaced or not?
It's progressive content encoded as interlaced. What is the big deal? That's very common.
Yes, the stream parameters are reported; there is no attempt to determine if the content is actually progressive/interlaced.
Yes, the stream parameters are reported; there is no attempt to determine if the content is actually progressive/interlaced.
Re: [RESOLVED] Interlaced or not?
25 fps (frames per second) footage must be encoded (or at least flagged as) interlaced for Blu-ray or DVD standards compliance, even when the original content is progressive. DGDecNV reports these streams always as interlaced.
Unfortunately some tools report 25 interlaced frames per second as "25i" while other tools report it as "50i" according to the 50 fields per seconds. This ambiguity is omnipresent, unfortunately.
Unfortunately some tools report 25 interlaced frames per second as "25i" while other tools report it as "50i" according to the 50 fields per seconds. This ambiguity is omnipresent, unfortunately.