Feature Requests

Support forum for DGDecNV
User avatar
Bullwinkle
Posts: 338
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2019 6:37 pm

Re: Feature Requests

Post by Bullwinkle »

What's in a number? A program by any other number would smell as sweet.
DAE avatar
astrayred
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 8:55 pm

Re: Feature Requests

Post by astrayred »

This will probably be a pain to implement, but is there any possibility of getting nvidia NGX working for upscaling video in DG Tools?

Link for nvidia NGX: https://developer.nvidia.com/rtx/ngx
User avatar
Rocky
Posts: 3556
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:57 pm

Re: Feature Requests

Post by Rocky »

If their claims about the simplicity of the API is true, then implementation may not be so difficult. I've applied for early access. We'll see if they grant it. Thank you for the request, astrayred.
User avatar
Rocky
Posts: 3556
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:57 pm

Re: Feature Requests

Post by Rocky »

My application was approved (in record time!) and I have downloaded the NGX SDK. As I get my feet wet I will report about it in another thread.
User avatar
Rocky
Posts: 3556
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:57 pm

Re: Feature Requests

Post by Rocky »

User avatar
Rocky
Posts: 3556
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:57 pm

Re: DGDemux parser integration

Post by Rocky »

Guest 2 wrote:
Tue May 26, 2020 7:50 am
It would be nice to have the same parser as DGDemux to select the correct mpls looking at lenght and streams, instead of needing to find it with other programs such as DGDemux itself or eac3to. :salute:

You already have the code, just make DGIndexNV capable of selecting a single file (usual behaviour) or give a "0" in the file field to select the whole directory.
Implemented in DGIndexNV rc7.
DAE avatar
Guest 2
Posts: 903
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 2:18 pm

Re: DGDemux parser integration

Post by Guest 2 »

Rocky wrote:
Fri Nov 27, 2020 2:41 pm
Implemented in DGIndexNV rc7.
Unfortunately my main computer motherboard had a major failure on July and I am still waiting for newer CPUs to become available.

Hope to be testing newer builds soon! :salute:
User avatar
DJATOM
Posts: 176
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2015 6:14 pm

Re: DGDemux parser integration

Post by DJATOM »

Guest 2 wrote:
Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:35 am
Rocky wrote:
Fri Nov 27, 2020 2:41 pm
Implemented in DGIndexNV rc7.
Unfortunately my main computer motherboard had a major failure on July and I am still waiting for newer CPUs to become available.

Hope to be testing newer builds soon! :salute:
If you meant Ryzen 5000, they are available, but surely overpriced AF. Same as of RTX 3080. I'm waiting for reasonable price (~950 $) in my country. Currently local shops selling them for $ 1350-1500 which is insane.
PC: RTX 2070 | Ryzen R9 5950X (no OC) | 64 GB RAM
Notebook: RTX 4060 | Ryzen R9 7945HX | 32 GB RAM
User avatar
Rocky
Posts: 3556
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:57 pm

Re: Feature Requests

Post by Rocky »

I want a 3090 and a threadripper PCIE 4.0 motherboard. Having trouble finding the former.
DAE avatar
Guest

Re: Feature Requests

Post by Guest »

Rocky wrote:
Tue Dec 01, 2020 10:02 am
I want a 3090 and a threadripper PCIE 4.0 motherboard. Having trouble finding the former.
The TR3960x CPU looks like a good one
User avatar
Rocky
Posts: 3556
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:57 pm

Re: Feature Requests

Post by Rocky »

Me want.
DAE avatar
Guest

Re: Feature Requests

Post by Guest »

DAE avatar
Guest 2
Posts: 903
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 2:18 pm

Re: Feature Requests

Post by Guest 2 »

Rocky wrote:
Tue Dec 01, 2020 10:02 am
I want a 3090 and a threadripper PCIE 4.0 motherboard. Having trouble finding the former.
Zen 3 based TR are just behind the corner. Availability... well... :D
User avatar
Rocky
Posts: 3556
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:57 pm

Re: Feature Requests

Post by Rocky »

If Zen 3 is better then me want that. Me want the best of everything.
User avatar
Rocky
Posts: 3556
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:57 pm

Re: Feature Requests

Post by Rocky »

I changed this thread to an announcement so that it is always visible at the top of the thread list.
DAE avatar
Guest 2
Posts: 903
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 2:18 pm

Feature Requests

Post by Guest 2 »

Is there any chance to see support via CUDA of non hardware decoded formats, such as x264 10 bit and/or 4:4:4?

I did a very stupid thing some years ago, encoding some material to x264 10 bit and now my TV can't digest them, so I have to reencode everything...
User avatar
Rocky
Posts: 3556
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:57 pm

Feature Requests

Post by Rocky »

Sorry, no chance.
DAE avatar
Guest 2
Posts: 903
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 2:18 pm

Feature Requests

Post by Guest 2 »

Rocky wrote:
Fri Jan 29, 2021 6:56 am
Sorry, no chance.
Ok, let's make a deal about preferred languages in demux section instead :belly-laugh:
User avatar
Rocky
Posts: 3556
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:57 pm

Feature Requests

Post by Rocky »

Guest 2, master negotiator.
DAE avatar
Boulder
Posts: 113
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 7:22 am

Feature Requests

Post by Boulder »

Guest 2 wrote:
Fri Jan 29, 2021 6:19 am
Is there any chance to see support via CUDA of non hardware decoded formats, such as x264 10 bit and/or 4:4:4?

I did a very stupid thing some years ago, encoding some material to x264 10 bit and now my TV can't digest them, so I have to reencode everything...
I'd rather invest in Odroid N2+ or similar and use it as an entertainment center with CoreELEC installed (supports retro gaming as well). Powerful enough to play 10bit h264 files without any issues.
DAE avatar
Guest 2
Posts: 903
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 2:18 pm

Feature Requests

Post by Guest 2 »

Boulder wrote:
Sat Jan 30, 2021 6:08 am
I'd rather invest in Odroid N2+ or similar and use it as an entertainment center with CoreELEC installed (supports retro gaming as well). Powerful enough to play 10bit h264 files without any issues.
I am saving money for next NUC from Intel, to use it as VM host too.
User avatar
Rocky
Posts: 3556
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 12:57 pm

Feature Requests

Post by Rocky »

Guest 2 wrote:
Fri Jan 29, 2021 8:49 am
Ok, let's make a deal about preferred languages in demux section instead
How do you want that to work? Shall it be based on the 3-letter language code?
DAE avatar
Guest 2
Posts: 903
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 2:18 pm

Feature Requests

Post by Guest 2 »

Rocky wrote:
Sat Jan 30, 2021 8:24 am
How do you want that to work? Shall it be based on the 3-letter language code?
The way it's more comfortable to you.

Almost all of us are used to 3-letter language code, i.e. ISO-639-2, as per Matroska version 1 thru 3, but since version 4 either ISO639-2 or BCP47 may be used, although BCP47 is reccomended.

As a matter of future proof code, I would say that every language showing, setting and filename output should be represented by BCP47, giving full compliance to Matroska.
User avatar
Curly
Posts: 712
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 11:05 am

Feature Requests

Post by Curly »

Guest 2 wrote:
Sat Jan 30, 2021 10:14 am
full compliance to Matroska.
Hey pal, we don't bow down to anyone.
DAE avatar
Guest 2
Posts: 903
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 2:18 pm

Feature Requests

Post by Guest 2 »

Curly wrote:
Sat Jan 30, 2021 10:49 am
Hey pal, we don't bow down to anyone.
No bowing, just comfortable use when multiplexing. :D
Post Reply