Feature Requests
- Bullwinkle
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2019 6:37 pm
Re: Feature Requests
What's in a number? A program by any other number would smell as sweet.
Re: Feature Requests
This will probably be a pain to implement, but is there any possibility of getting nvidia NGX working for upscaling video in DG Tools?
Link for nvidia NGX: https://developer.nvidia.com/rtx/ngx
Link for nvidia NGX: https://developer.nvidia.com/rtx/ngx
Re: Feature Requests
If their claims about the simplicity of the API is true, then implementation may not be so difficult. I've applied for early access. We'll see if they grant it. Thank you for the request, astrayred.
Re: Feature Requests
My application was approved (in record time!) and I have downloaded the NGX SDK. As I get my feet wet I will report about it in another thread.
Re: DGDemux parser integration
Implemented in DGIndexNV rc7.Guest 2 wrote: ↑Tue May 26, 2020 7:50 amIt would be nice to have the same parser as DGDemux to select the correct mpls looking at lenght and streams, instead of needing to find it with other programs such as DGDemux itself or eac3to.
You already have the code, just make DGIndexNV capable of selecting a single file (usual behaviour) or give a "0" in the file field to select the whole directory.
Re: DGDemux parser integration
If you meant Ryzen 5000, they are available, but surely overpriced AF. Same as of RTX 3080. I'm waiting for reasonable price (~950 $) in my country. Currently local shops selling them for $ 1350-1500 which is insane.
PC: RTX 2070 | Ryzen R9 5950X (no OC) | 64 GB RAM
Notebook: RTX 4060 | Ryzen R9 7945HX | 32 GB RAM
Notebook: RTX 4060 | Ryzen R9 7945HX | 32 GB RAM
Re: Feature Requests
I want a 3090 and a threadripper PCIE 4.0 motherboard. Having trouble finding the former.
Re: Feature Requests
Me want.
Re: Feature Requests
Combined with this
https://www.newegg.com/asus-hyper-m-2-x ... -_-Product
https://www.newegg.com/asus-hyper-m-2-x ... -_-Product
Re: Feature Requests
If Zen 3 is better then me want that. Me want the best of everything.
Re: Feature Requests
I changed this thread to an announcement so that it is always visible at the top of the thread list.
Feature Requests
Is there any chance to see support via CUDA of non hardware decoded formats, such as x264 10 bit and/or 4:4:4?
I did a very stupid thing some years ago, encoding some material to x264 10 bit and now my TV can't digest them, so I have to reencode everything...
I did a very stupid thing some years ago, encoding some material to x264 10 bit and now my TV can't digest them, so I have to reencode everything...
Feature Requests
Sorry, no chance.
Feature Requests
Guest 2, master negotiator.
Feature Requests
I'd rather invest in Odroid N2+ or similar and use it as an entertainment center with CoreELEC installed (supports retro gaming as well). Powerful enough to play 10bit h264 files without any issues.Guest 2 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 29, 2021 6:19 amIs there any chance to see support via CUDA of non hardware decoded formats, such as x264 10 bit and/or 4:4:4?
I did a very stupid thing some years ago, encoding some material to x264 10 bit and now my TV can't digest them, so I have to reencode everything...
Feature Requests
I am saving money for next NUC from Intel, to use it as VM host too.
Feature Requests
The way it's more comfortable to you.
Almost all of us are used to 3-letter language code, i.e. ISO-639-2, as per Matroska version 1 thru 3, but since version 4 either ISO639-2 or BCP47 may be used, although BCP47 is reccomended.
As a matter of future proof code, I would say that every language showing, setting and filename output should be represented by BCP47, giving full compliance to Matroska.