DGDecIM beta 21
DGDecIM beta 21
DGDecIM beta 21 is now available:
* Rebuilt with Intel MSDK INDE 2015 Update 1 to solve some problem AVC stream decoding.
* Large resolutions such as 2160p are now supported.
http://rationalqm.us/misc/dgdecim_b21.zip
* Rebuilt with Intel MSDK INDE 2015 Update 1 to solve some problem AVC stream decoding.
* Large resolutions such as 2160p are now supported.
http://rationalqm.us/misc/dgdecim_b21.zip
Re: DGDecIM beta 21
I dont see any news about b50 available in news section:
In Notes.txt is written:
Isnt this strange that b21 supports deinterlacing and b50 not? Do you have any changelog for b50 ? And why it has not been post in news section? ![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
Code: Select all
http://rationalqm.us/dgdecim/dgdecim_b50.zip
Code: Select all
8. Deinterlacing (deinterlace > 0) is not yet supported.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
Re: DGDecIM beta 21
b21 supported deinterlacing but with some issues for double-rate (bobbing). The problem for b21 was that it generated spurious frames at the beginning of the stream (in all cases, not just for deinterlacing) and so did not match DGDecNV output. That is terrible for a filter that wants to claim frame accuracy! To fix that I had to replace the older Intel reference code for decoding/VPP with the newer one. But the newer one is not coded to support bobbing and there is no Intel sample that demonstrates that. The new Intel reference code was apparently written by clueless interns, and forget getting escalated to a competent engineer if you are not an OEM. I asked at the Intel forum and they told me I am on my own. I have not yet been able to make it work. Single-rate works and I could re-enable it. I am debating doing that but for now all deinterlacing is disabled. Do you need single-rate or double-rate?
Another relevant point is that enabling deinterlacing causes a major hit to performance, unlike DGDecNV deinterlacing.
I need to make a change log and news item. Thanks for pointing it out.
Another relevant point is that enabling deinterlacing causes a major hit to performance, unlike DGDecNV deinterlacing.
I need to make a change log and news item. Thanks for pointing it out.
Re: DGDecIM beta 21
Personally need only single rate deint.
Re: DGDecIM beta 21
How it looks now with deinterlace ? Still disabled even single rate deint?
Re: DGDecIM beta 21
Still disabled. I can't see getting motivated on this anytime soon. Let's see how Skylake and the new drivers pan out before investing any more time into IMSDK.
Re: DGDecIM beta 21
OK thank you.
Does it now deserve it's own topic in the main forum ?
Does it now deserve it's own topic in the main forum ?
I really do like it here.
Re: DGDecIM beta 21
I don't see enough interest to justify it. And nothing has improved regarding Intel support.
Re: DGDecIM beta 21
Oh dear.
Well ... you have put time and effort into it ... and could that maybe be interest enough ?![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
Well ... you have put time and effort into it ... and could that maybe be interest enough ?
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
I really do like it here.
Re: DGDecIM beta 21
I was just looking into deinterlacing today. No promises, but I don't have much else to do right now.
As to the forum, the answer is definitely yes or no, but I'm not sure which.![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_e_confused.gif)
As to the forum, the answer is definitely yes or no, but I'm not sure which.
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_e_confused.gif)